Notes on the SF tracker upgrade: While the Allura tracker has some nice features such as custom fields and flexible searches, and it does look very promising, it seems to be a step down in terms of usability at this point. Most noticable are the extremely slow page loads some times of the day (often over 10 seconds). This does not encourage experimentation with the new interface. (Hopefully this is a temporary issue that will clear up soon?) This is for pages in the tracker at http://sourceforge.net/p/scummvm/bugs/ . Import: The data import from the old tracker is a bit rough. The old group and category fields are seemingly arbitrarily converted into respectively milestones and labels. The Milestone field is then renamed to Group, but this change is not consistent throughout the interface: there's still "Edit milestones", and the column header is still "Milestone". (Additionally, you lose the ability to have an actual milestone field.) The spaces in our old group names were replaced by underscores, but we could manually change them back to spaces in the "Edit Milestones" window. The import has discarded each ticket's individual history (except comments), losing information about which dev performed certain actions. Since the new tracker does display this information for changes performed post-upgrade, it is unclear why this data is not imported. Ticket text is sometimes mangled. For example, for respectively inline gdb backtraces or diffs: http://sourceforge.net/p/scummvm/bugs/43/ http://sourceforge.net/p/scummvm/bugs/2586/#e337 Search: When searching, the search syntax requires you to memorize field names (and is inconsistent, requiring underscores in front of custom fields). This is complicated by not being able to open the search help window in a separate browser window. Instead, it pops up on top of the search bar so that you can't easily edit the search string with the help as a reference. Similarly, there's no list of custom fields available for easy reference when searching. Fields of "select" type (or milestones) have explicit lists of possible values, but there's no way to use these lists to search. (So again requiring memorization.) While there is such a list for milestones in the left bar, there is then no way to restrict searches to this selected milestone, as far as I can tell. And since it doesn't show the actual search string to use to get this ('_milestone:"something"') you can't just add an "and some-other-condition" to the search string. There is no way to pre-specify the sort order in saved searches that I can see. Specifically "sort by decreasing priority" or "sort by milestone" would be nice to able to specify. Especially since changing sort order manually by clicking on the column header seems to be a very slow-loading operation on even medium-sized searches. (This is worse when you want descending order, because that requires two clicks.) I did see the option to sort by adding a &sort= argument to the URL manually. Those URLs are then of course bookmarkable in a browser or linkable from a webpage as a workaround. Misc: Colour-coding bugs based on priority was a nice feature of the old tracker, I think. The status "open" is green, and "closed" is red. I'm not sure if those are the most logical colours. The lack of an export/backup option feels very uncomfortable. [ https://sourceforge.net/p/allura/tickets/3154 ] Comments and ticket changes are combined unintuitively in the Discussion on a ticket: In a test ticket, I pressed edit, wrote a comment and changed the status and then pressed save. This showed up as two separate blocks in the Discussion. ("status: open -> closed" and separately "A comment"). Afterwards, I changed the status again, and this change was merged with the "A comment" block. That last change also did not trigger a notification email. You can have multiple fields of type "Milestone", but only a single one can be changed in the "Edit Milestones" screen. I see no way to actually add values to the dropdown boxes of the secondary milestone-type fields. There is a button "New Milestone" in the "Field management" interface, but pressing it does nothing. It looks like users may be able to edit/delete their own comments after posting them, which has the potential of confusing discussions.